Planning is a Climate Change Adaptation Strategy

There was a little news article in The National Newspaper from the 20th Sept., 2012, which I thought was the most important news article of the day. However, that was all it was – a small article on page 7.

The Deputy Prime Minister,  Hon. Leon Dion was briefed on the findings by a report on the Risk Assessment of Catastrophes in the Pacific. The reported states that, in the next 50 years, PNG is expected to incur loss exceeding US$700 million with casualties over 5,000 from natural disasters.

In PNG, we expect disasters and losses, however, we never monetize the costs of disasters. When we do, as was done in that report, and compare with the money we have, we begin to realize how unprepared we really are to future natural disasters. The disasters, when compounded with the unpredictable impacts of climate change – the cost as well as number of casualties will certainly go right up.

The current trend on how we approach disasters, is to just turn up and contribute money after the disaster has already happened. This shows a lack of forethought and anticipation of future happenings.

The Deputy PM made a good call for readiness, when he called for effective coordination and adequate financing to be made available for planning for disasters. Sadly that is all he says.  There is no mention of a strategy for implementation or a reassurance that a strategy would be discussed.

If that speech lacked a strategy, a strategy is now being set down in the Climate Change Policy being developed by the Office of Climate Change and development (OCCD). The document from the OCCD places great emphasis on proper planning and coordination to mitigate climate change, optimum utilization of renewable energy sources, strengthening climate resilient initiatives and driving forward a low carbon growth pathway in the future.

A strategy for PNG must  be informed by well-researched and scientifically credible data. The recently launched books containing  scientific assessment of climate change in the Pacific contains data collected over time that can be mined to support plans for climate change adaptation.  This and other scientifically credible data can greatly inform and fortify any strategy the country comes up with.

A workable plan, in my opinion, will be for the government to direct all government sectors and line agencies to align their scope of responsibilities with the climate change policy.  This means that OCCD must pass the Climate Change Policy which has been in draft for a number of years.  After the policy is done, funds must be made available for those initiatives.

A few initiatives that come to mind are as listed below.

The strategy must include climate-proofing infrastructure. In designing infrastructure,  the responsible organisation must work closely with best engineering practices, supported by good data and credible science on the effect of climate change on infrastructure. Construction of climate-proof infrastructure  will save money and time in the future.

Furthermore, the government must put more money into health education. Health concerns arising from water and food contamination always come to the forefront with natural disasters. Money must be spent on preventative education to ensure  that the affected people can apply first-aid on themselves – this step will minimize the number of casualties as well as the cost of treating those affected by the disaster.

Since bulk of Papua New Guineans still depend on agriculture to sustain their livelihood, money must also be put into agriculture research. The National Agriculture Research Institute (NARI) must continue with its excellent programs on food and seed storage techniques, so that food and seeds can be kept over long periods of time over unpredictable weather  conditions. NARI also has programs on propagating drought resistant crops, likewise, effort must be put into propagating crops that can tolerate a lot of water.

The  National Weather Service’s must also be well- funded and equipped with state-of –the art instruments to predict the weather  and inform people who will take steps to move themselves out of danger as first line of defense.  Furthermore, the Provincial Disaster Offices must be well equipped and well-funded as the first line response to disasters. 

In conclusion, we must anticipate future events and prepare for them using as many information sources as possible. A well thought out plan is in itself a climate change adaptation strategy.

(Ref: The National (2012), Dion: Country expects loss. The National Newspaper, 20 September 2012, pg 7)


  1. dreamzmedia said,

    October 3, 2012 at 11:02 pm

    Great article. It touches on the crux of the matter with regard to successive governments’ inaction over the years. But we have had more than our fare share of natural disasters over the years. By now we should have been more strategic enough in addressing these critical issues.
    I fail to understand why we keep getting the necessary fundamentals wrong all the time. Is it because we simply lack lateral thinking altogether?

    • October 5, 2012 at 1:59 am

      Maybe it is the system – not the individuals that make up the system. Most individuals seem to have their life all worked out, .. but seems these individuals cannot take those life skills including lateral thinking skills into the system.

      It seems like the system keeps favoring those that lack the necessary skills. It also seems like the system is a living, thinking organism that is deliberately suppressing learning and growth.

      Surely there must be a way to break that system.

      One way I know is the process of documenting experiences that can be passed on. Human minds forget details, reports on paper go missing, inks fade, paper eaten by silverfish and mold. But with advances in ICT, we can easily build good databases to keep all these information together to inform decisions about our future.

      Maybe all sectors should have a planning department that is wholly responsible for mining databases for information to help with planning.

  2. dreamzmedia said,

    October 3, 2012 at 11:03 pm

    By the way, the newspaper article referred to above can be seen here ->

  3. dreamzmedia said,

    October 3, 2012 at 11:25 pm

    Reblogged this on Partners in Conservation in PNG and commented:
    This is a great article by Tanya Zeriga-Alone on her blog Emnaupng on the government’s need for foresight to plan and strategies now to be ready for natural disasters, especially with the ever increasing threat of the negative effects of Climate Change

  4. October 4, 2012 at 12:18 am

    Climate change is not the sole contributor to natural disasters – but your point is valid. As a nation, we are under-prepared when it comes to natural disasters. The 1997 Aitape Tsunami showed us how poorly our response systems were – both in disaster identification, response and management. Furthermore, the recent Tumbi Landslide in the Southern Highlands shows us that the National Disaster Center lacks the capacity and skills to deal with natural disasters in an effective and efficient manner. The Commission of Inquiry into the sinking of the Rabaul Queen shows us that stage agencies responsible for managing disasters are not in good shape. A review of the national framework is in order. The time to act is now.

    • October 5, 2012 at 2:29 am

      Agree with you . Is there any way to push for the review of the national framework now? or should we wait until the next disaster strikes?

  5. chweber99 said,

    October 10, 2012 at 1:01 am

    Reblogged this on Musings on the Risks of Climate Change and commented:
    Some thinking on risk assessment of catastrophes in the Pacific region. While not having read the report, this report does not solely deal with the risk from climate change influenced catastrophe’s. Some inititaves being taken by the government of Papua New Guinea to prepare for this including climate resilience and low carbon growth. Good points about the need to align all strategies and plans with the overriding concern of climate change.

  6. August 28, 2015 at 1:01 pm

    […] cause of failure can be due to lack of follow through – so many ministers of the government give lip service to citizen programs but never follow through. An example from 2012 can be seen here. Such mediocre […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: